Phil Soffer is Vice President of Product Marketing at Lithium Technologies. He has held a number of positions at the company influencing the direction of the platform, most recently running Product Management.
The return on technology investments is a subject of some fascination to everyone from CIOs to software marketers (cough) to economists. In 1987, the Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Solow remarked jokingly that, "We see computers everywhere but in the productivity statistics." In other words, lots of investment, little return.
But by the end of the 1990s even Solow couldn't get away with a joke like that. There emerged some consensus that the noteworthy US productivity gains over that decade owed at least something to the application of information technology, especially in sectors that applied such technologies intensively. In other words, lots of investment, finally some return.
At the macro-economic level, at least, you can do studies for years without seeing any return on a technology investment, then the returns pop up like mushrooms.
At the level of the individual technology initiative, there is a related paradox: we talk most about ROI at the early stages of the adoption curve, which is -- from a financial perspective -- when we actually have the least definitive things to say about ROI.
If you'll forgive this misappropriation of Gandhi: first they say it's a science project, then they demand ROI numbers and laugh at them, then they admit there might be some value to what you're doing, then the technology becomes so pervasive that no one asks about ROI any more.
So we spill a lot more ink about the ROI of social media projects than we do, say, about Microsoft Exchange. In other words, in terms of social media projects, we're probably somewhere in the "they demand ROI numbers and laugh at them" stage.
Not that I'm complaining at all, mind you. That's actually the best stage of the technology ROI lifecycle, because when you're at that stage, you're actually able to talk to the business about the practical application of what you're doing in terms that everyone in business understands.
Which brings us to a feature of our new Engagement Center: the Support ROI application. Matt is blogging about the feature in some detail elsewhere, so I won't go into that.
But I do want to say a few things, and perhaps to spark some discussions.
First, since we're at the "laugh at your numbers" stage of the adoption curve,
I want to say proactively that no one here thinks that the numbers our tool spits out are going to be definitive. Nor would the numbers pass muster with your finance department. Matt knows that -- he even went to a business school where they make you do math.
Why bother, then? A few reasons:
We know that there are a lot of other ways to think about the ROI of Social CRM, and we'll be exploring those in future posts and future versions of the software. But we think this is a nice start.
What do you think?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.